why are books without pictures considered to be smart and books with pictures considered to be elementary?
having a visual with words actually helps to foster learning and boosts memory i find myself studying people for some classes and the whole time i have no idea what they look like or the environment they lived in or anything what is so bad about including pictures to go with your words? also pictures can help to solidify the truth of what u are saying or like.. say if we all imagine a pink elephant.. ok we all got pink elephant but we will all imagine a different pink elephant.. we will attach different characteristics to our personally imagined pink elephant if there's a picture then we can all be on the same page as to what it looks like, where it lives, all of its attributes, maybe we can even decipher its attitude from its facial expression or demeanor.. is it a talking cartoonish pink elephant or a real pink elephant with a skin disease? without pictures we are sometimes forced to make assumptions if pictures meant nothing and had no importance, do u think 96% of households in the united states would have televisions? like who made this notion of intelligence having to be presented in certain ways? dnt get me wrong there's nothing wrong with the written word but songs, comics, plays, artwork, humor, or even a combination of any of these are all valid forms of coming to "know" a thing and they help to break up monotony
3 Comments
Giles
12/11/2011 01:19:36 pm
Arrogant hypocrits are anti-pics,or else theyd never waych movies theyd only listen to old re orded radio dramas
Reply
jaims
12/11/2011 02:47:37 pm
its up to u and i to stop the anti-pic movement.. UNITE!!!!
Reply
Giles
12/14/2011 07:50:28 am
Man Down!
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
JaimsI still got teh swag-flu. Archives
December 2011
|